[Build Backlinks Online] A Startling Case Study of Manual Penalties and Negative SEO

Build Backlinks Online has posted a new item, 'A Startling Case Study of Manual
Penalties and Negative SEO'

Posted by YonDotanThis post was originally in YouMoz, and was promoted to the
main blog because it provides great value and interest to our community. The
author's views are entirely his or her own and may not reflect the views of Moz,
Inc.
This January, I was at a talk at SMX Israel by John Mueller â
Googleâs Webmaster Trends Analyst â about how to recover from a
manual penalty. The sessionâs moderator opened the talk by asking the
hundreds of people seated in the room to raise their hands if they had ever been
affected by or had a client that was affected by a manual penalty. Nearly the
entire room raised their hands â myself included.

Setting the Plot

I am the head of SEO at yellowHEAD, an online marketing agency. One of our
clients, whom we are very lucky to have, is a company called Ginger Software.
Ginger has a set of context-sensitive grammar and spell check tools that can be
integrated with e-mails, browsers, Microsoft Office, and more. When we began
working with Ginger, they were in a great state from an SEO perspective. I
wonât get into traffic specifics, but their site has an Alexa ranking of
around 7,000.


Ginger was getting traffic from thousands of different keywords. They had
links from news portals, review websites, forums, social bookmarks â all
part of a really great backlink profile. Ginger could be in a whole separate
case study about the benefits of a content strategy. They have put months of
work into online tools, sections about spelling mistakes, grammar rules, and
more. These things have attracted great traffic and links from around the world.

The Plot Thickens

Given the above, you can imagine our surprise when one day in my inbox I found
the dreaded notice from Google that gingersoftware.com had a site-wide manual
penalty for unnatural inbound links. We quickly set up a call and went through
the tooth-rattling ordeal of explaining to our client that they werenât
even ranked for their brand name. Organic traffic dropped by a whopping 94% -
and that for a website that gets 66% of its traffic from Google-based organic
search.






Iâm not going to highlight where they got the penalty â because I
think you can tell.

Full Disclosure

Before we go on any further with this case study, I should come clean. In the
years of my working in SEO, I have shamelessly bought links, posted crappy blog
and forum comments, and run programs that automatically build thousands of spam
links. I have bought expired domains, created blog networks, and have ranked
affiliate sites with every manner of blackhat technique.


With that off my chest â I will say with as clean a conscience as
possible, we did absolutely nothing of the sort for Ginger. While everyone at
yellowHEAD has experience with all manners of SEO tactics, in our work as an
agency we work with big brands, the presence of which we are categorically not
willing to risk. Ginger is a true example of a site that has ranked well because
of an extensive and well-thought out content strategy; a strategy driven by
creating valuable content for users. When analyzing Gingerâs backlinks, we
were amazed to see the kinds of links that had been created because of this
strategy. Take, for example, this forum link on the Texas Fishing Forums.


I was positive that this link would be a spam forum comment or something of
the sort. Turns out that itâs a page on a fishing forum about Zebra
Mussels. Someone got confused and called them Zebra Muscles; a veteran user
corrected them by linking to Gingerâs page about muscle vs mussel.

The Plot Thickensâ More.

As we dug deeper into Gingerâs backlinks, we quickly began to find the
problem. Ginger had recently accrued a large number of extremely spammy links.
Bear with me for a little bit because these links require some explanation.
GingerSoftware.com was being linked to from random pages on dozens of different
websites in clearly spun articles about pornography, pharmaceuticals, gambling,
and more. These pages were linking to random marginal articles on Gingerâs
website like this page always using the same few keywords â
âoccurred,â âsubsequently,â and a few other similar
words. The only thing these words had in common was that Ginger was ranked in
the top three for them in Google.




I had to blur most of the text from this page, as it was inappropriate.


Now, needless to say, even if we were trying to rank Gingerâs site
letâs call it âunconventionally,â we wouldn't have done it to
unimportant pages that were already ranking in the top three from articles about
pornography.

Now hereâs where it gets REALLY interesting

Further investigation into these pages found the same exact articles on dozens
of other websites, all linking to different websites using exactly the same
keywords. For example:






Link to Wiktionary.org




Link to TheFreeDictionary.com






Link to Thesaurus.com

So â What the $#@!%!#$^ are these links?!

As I mentioned in my disclosure previously â I am no newcomer to link
spam, so I happen to know a bit about what these links are. These articles were,
first and foremost, not created by us or by anyone else at Ginger. They were
also not posted with Ginger Software or any of the other websites linked to in
those articles in mind. These articles were posted by spammers using programs
which automatically build links (my guess is GSA Search Engine Ranker) in order
to rank websites. Each one of these articles linked to some spam website (think
something like the-best-diet-pills-green-coffee-beans-are-awesome . info or some
nonsense like that) in addition to linking to Ginger.


These programs find places on the internet where they can automatically post
articles with links. As a way to âtrickâ Google into thinking the
links are natural, they also include links to other big websites in good
neighborhoods. Common targets for these kinds of links include Wikipedia, BBC,
CNN, and other such websites.


Ginger was not the victim of negative SEO, but was simply caught in the
crossfire of some spammers trying to promote their own websites.

We Had Doubts

Once we found these links, we honed our search to find all of them. We were
able to do this using Ahrefs, which is a fantastic tool for any sort of link
analysis. We organized all of the links to Ginger by anchor text and went after
all of the ones with the aforementioned keywords. We removed as many of these
links as possible, disavowed the rest, and filed for reconsideration as
described above.


As confident as we were on the face of it all â we had serious doubts.
We knew how important it was for Gingerâs business to get over this
penalty as quickly as possible and didn't want to get anything wrong. We
couldn't find any other âbad linksâ besides these ones but we kept
thinking to ourselves âthereâs no way that Google completely slapped
a website due to some spam links to these random pages.â There had to be
more to it than that!


Ginger themselves handled this situation incredibly. Where they could have
yelled and gotten angry, instead they said, in a sentence âOk â
letâs fix this. How do we help?â With Gingerâs help, we
mobilized dozens of people inside their company, trained them on finding bad
links, manually reviewed over 40,000 links, contacted all domains which had spam
links on them, disavowed everything we couldn't get to, and submitted the
request for reconsideration on December 17th, only five days after the site got
penalized. The extreme sense of urgency behind this came both because of the
importance of organic traffic for Ginger Software, and because the upcoming
Christmas and New Yearâs holidays. We knew that everyone going on vacation
would significantly increase the amount of time it took to have the
reconsideration request reviewed. You can find a very long and detailed
explanation of the process we used to clean up Ginger's links here.


Despite the speed with which we were able to submit the request, it took
nearly a month to hear back from Google. On January 15th, we received a message
in Google Webmaster Tools that the penalty had been revoked. We, and the staff
at Ginger, were ecstatic and spent the next few days glued to our ranking
trackers and to Google Analytics to see what would happen. Rankings and traffic
quickly began to rise and, as of the writing of this article, traffic is at
about 82% of pre-penalty levels.




Lo and Behold â Rankings!






The (Very) Unofficial Response from Google

Getting over the manual penalty, in some ways, was almost as surprising as
getting it. The fact that all we did was remove and disavow the negative SEO
links and the penalty was removed indicates that, indeed, the penalty may have
been caused entirely by those links.


At the manual penalty session of SMX, towards the end of the talk, I crept
slowly towards the front of the room and as soon as the talk was over, as
unexpectedly as a manual penalty, I pounced to the front of the speakersâ
podium to talk to John Mueller before everyone else. I explained to him (in a
much shorter version than this article) the situation with Ginger and asked if
they were aware of this at Google and what they plan to do about it.


John responded with something along the lines of the following:


âYou mean like when somebody creates spam links but also links to
Wikipedia? â We have seen it happen before. Sometimes we can tell but
sometimes itâs a little bit harderâ but [if] you get a manual
penalty from it you will know about it so you can just disavow the links.â


I have to say, I was pretty surprised with that response. While it wasn't
exactly an admission of guilt, it wasn't a denial either. He basically said yes,
it can happen but if it happens you will get a manual penalty, so youâll
know about it!

So What Does It All Mean?

One wonders if Google understands the impact a manual penalty can have on a
business and if they truly accept the responsibility that comes along with
handing out these kinds of punishments. Ginger, as a company, relies on search
traffic as their main method of user acquisition and they are not unique in that
sense. There are a few important takeaways here.


1.) CHECK YOUR BACKLINKS


No matter who you are â big or small, this is crucial. This kind of
thing can happen, seemingly, to anyone. We have instated a weekly backlink scan
for Ginger Software in which we look through all of their new links from
Webmaster Tools, AHREFS, and Majestic SEO. If we find any more spam links (which
we still are finding), we try to remove them and add them to the disavow list.
Time consuming? Yes. Critical? Yes.


2.) Negative SEO is Alive and Real


It has been my thinking for a long time that links should not be able to hurt
your website. At the most, a link should be discounted if it is considered bad.
The current system is dangerous and too easy to game. With Ginger, it was
obvious (to us at least) that these links were no doing of their own. The links
were in absurd places of the lowest quality and linked to low-benefit
unimportant pages of Gingerâs website. If this was actually a negative SEO
attack, imagine how easy it would be to make it look like it was the
companyâs doing.


3.) Google is making themselves look REALLY bad.


The action that Google took in this case was far too drastic. The site
didnât receive a partial penalty, but rather a full-blown sitewide
penalty. According to the keyword planner, for the top four branded terms for
Ginger, there are 23,300 searches per month. In this case that became 23,300
searches per month where people could not find exactly what they were looking
for.




Google has an amazing amount of work on their hands staying ahead of the
spammers of the world, but they have also become the foundation of the business
models of companies worldwide. To quote from FDR and Spiderman (who can argue
with that???), âwith great power comes great responsibility.â We can
only hope that Google will heed these words and, in the meantime, we will be
happy with the fact that Ginger are back up and running.
Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten
hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think
of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but
want to read!



You may view the latest post at
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/seomoz/~3/iSEsm7K43j4/a-startling-case-study-of-manual-penalties-and-negative-seo

You received this e-mail because you asked to be notified when new updates are
posted.
Best regards,
Build Backlinks Online
peter.clarke@designed-for-success.com